Feminist Mom Promises To Turn 3-Year-Old Son “Into A Proud Princess Whether He Likes It Or Not”

She’s making him take ballet class. —>

crazy-woman

Conservative News | Jacob Airey

Leftist feminists are becoming a parody of their own movement.

America’s neighbors to the north are having their own problems with third wave feminists. One left-wing Canadian writer had a meltdown when she realized that her son wanted to act like a boy. She is forcing him to take ballet to punish him for his masculine microaggressions.

The Daily Wire reports,

I’m going to turn the little alphabet belcher into a proud princess whether he likes it or not,” says Canadian columnist and proud feminist Leah McLaren of her thee-year-old son.

McLaren can’t handle the reality that her three-year-old son James is very masculine; he doesn’t like pretty flowers, the princess movie Frozen, or pink popsicles. Clearly, young James has been affected by societal pressures and cultural norms, or something, so McLaren has made up her mind to save him from his toxic masculinity and all that entails by forcing traditionally “girlish” things upon him, like crowns made of flowers and ballet classes.

This is uncanny. Left-wing feminists are all about aoindg reinforcing a stereotype on a person. Yet this blogging mother is forcing the stereotype of a special snowflake beta male on her own son. This is an overreaction to a boy who just wants to act like a man. The whole circumstance is very telling of not just McLaren, but her whole movement of feminists who want conformity not freedom.

The sad thing is, she panicked and decided to force him into signing up for ballet when he refused a dandelion. Her panic only gets more intense.

– I can’t imagine the repercussions for James after McLaren learns he likes trucks over glitter. A lifetime of dress-up?

The feminist columnist continues to spiral over her son’s boyish tendencies: “You might think this is no big deal,” she writes, “that my son is just behaving ‘naturally,’ but I’m automatically wary of notions of biological determinism. When he hands me back a flower because pretty things are for girls, I think, what’s next? Kindness? Decency? Dancing?”

You see, everyone knows rejecting a flower as a male three-year-old is the gateway to adult misogyny. I’m glad McLaren spotted this early. –

It is sad that McLaren cannot accept her son for who he is. She is instead choosing to beat out his personality by force feeding him and conditioning him in such a harsh manner.

“Much as I dislike the idea of anything being categorized as inherently feminine or masculine, it’s hard to explain poststructuralist gender theory to a three-year old,” complains the feminist. “If I want my son to love and respect women, I am going to have to teach him to embrace – and ideally appreciate – ‘girlish’ things. That’s why I’m weaving him a dandelion crown and signing him up for ballet.

“I’m going to turn the little alphabet belcher into a proud princess whether he likes it or not,” she concludes.

Remember, gender is completely removed from sex and therefore we must allow all children to find their own “gender identity” without parental rearing.

Left-wing feminists talk about not wanting to force a particular gender role or stereotype. How is forcing her masculine son to act in what McLaren thinks is feminine going to make grow out of it? He is three-years old. Let him be a kid and discover what he likes on his own.

Isn’t that what third wave feminists are begging for themselves?