Obama’s Record of Altering National Intelligence Data on ISIS Good Reason to Also Doubt Russian Hacking Narrative

Obama expects public to blindly accept Russian conspiracy despite history of lies. —>

11shgn5-640x431

Buy “A Perfect Liberal Storm” here!

We’ve seen an endless array of political narrative on Russia and their alleged involvement in the 2016 election, from the Obama regime & their now proven to be sycophantic old media.

We’ve also seen a categorical denial of Russia’s involvement in the leaking of the truth regarding the DNC and Democrat operatives, by none other than the head of WikiLeaks, who, since the founding of his whistleblower site, has never been proven wrong.

Further, WikiLeaks is the organization that actually released the sensitive emails, and yet, their name never seems to surface from the Obama regime’s security narrative.

We’ve also seen repeated efforts by Obama and other Democrat leaders to delegitimize Trump’s victory while various government bureaus, acting in the political sphere, have played their respective roles in the 2016 election, in unprecedented ways.

So, what are we to believe? In answer to that question look no further than Obama’s track record on trying to influence US intelligence agencies. In fact, Obama fired Trump’s NSA, General Mike Flynn, because he refused to follow Obama’s pre-written script on Islamic terrorism In general and ISIS specifically.

Mike Flynn: Obama fired me for calling our enemies radical jihadists 

Throw in Obama’s lately betrayal of Israel and the fact that Russia went along with the regime’s action in that regard, and we can begin to see the shadows of misdirection culminating.

Then we have the story published in the recent past, but now mostly forgotten, on how Obama forced intel analysts to alter their intel reports in order to cover up the severity of ISIS and the Islamic terror problem.

Indeed, many US intelligence analysts were fired or pushed out of the agency for failing to suborn themselves to Obama’s custom-cooked ISIS data.

The question should now be why should we believe Obama and his loyal operatives, at this point? Remember also when national security director James Clapper lied to congress directly on whether or not everyday Americans were being monitored by the US government?

Why should America believe Mr. Clapper now? Perhaps he’s attained religion, or maybe he’s merely turned over a new leaf?

Moreover, if national security is suddenly so important to the regime, why is it that Obama and his minions continue to insist upon open borders and the requisite security risks which go along with allowing hundreds of thousands into America,  unvetted and certainly without security concerns?

Regarding Obama’s interference in intel reports, an inspector general from the Pentagon stated “maybe” back in November of 2015, as to the question of White House interference in intel, which is why the government has been conducting an investigation (of itself) to find out.

Obama’s seeming surprise on the rise of ISIS was due to a failure of intel from the Pentagon or at least so stated the White House. However, new facts later emerged that the intel was bad only because the Obama regime had been the entity that was having the intel altered, in the first place.

In October of 2015, Obama dropped more than 50 tons of ammunition to both Al Qaeda and ISIL, in Syria, in Obama’s almost desperate attempt to reignite US efforts to topple the Syrian regime of Bashir al-Assad, under the cover of US efforts to stamp out ISIS.

In the modern day, while Obama has indicated that the goal of current US efforts are to topple the caliphate building terrorist army known as ISIS, the behind-the-scenes theory went that the weapons were, in fact, being dropped in order to re-arm ISIS, not defeat them.

 The Daily Beast had much earlier reported that senior intelligence officials were, in fact, being manipulated into altering their intelligence reports in order to make it appear that the Obama regime’s half-waged war against ISIS, is real:

“Two senior intelligence analysts at U.S. Central Command say the military has forced them out of their jobs because of their skeptical reporting on U.S.-backed rebel groups in Syria, three sources with knowledge of their claim told The Daily Beast.

It’s the first known instance of possible reprisals against CENTCOM personnel after analysts accused their bosses of manipulating intelligence reports about the U.S.-led campaign against ISIS in order to paint a rosier picture of progress in the war.”

The simple fact is, that Obama’s war against ISIS has been waged largely for appearances only, and the only intel alterations being done were at the direction of the White House.

“One of the analysts alleging reprisals is the top analyst in charge of Syria issues at CENTCOM. He and a colleague doubted rebels’ capabilities and their commitment to U.S. objectives in the region.

The analysts have been effectively sidelined from their positions and will no longer be working at CENTCOM, according to two individuals familiar with the dispute, and who spoke on condition of anonymity. The analysts’ skeptical views put them at odds with military brass, who last year had predicted that a so-called moderate opposition would make up a 15,000-man ground force to take on ISIS in its self-declared caliphate. An initial $500 million program to train and arm those fighters failed spectacularly.

And until the very end, Pentagon leaders claimed the operation was more or less on track. Lawmakers called the plan a “joke” when Gen. Lloyd Austin, the CENTCOM commander, finally testified last September that there were just “four or five” American-trained fighters in Syria.While the mainstream media reported that the US military, via an Obama directive, dropped in 50 tons of ammunition to the Syrian rebels, one night in October of 2015, the media rarely identifies who, exactly, these rebels are.” (Read more of this report at The Daily Beast)

While the rebel factions were said to be comprised of as many as 41 groups, the largest and most powerful appear to be Al Nussra, which is a Sunni Islamic faction of Al Qaeda, Hizb-ut-Tahrir, an Islamist group dedicated to the installation of a Mideast Caliphate, and the Muslim Brotherhood, which is the root organization of hundreds of terrorist groups, each of which, are also inspired to build a Caliphate coalition across the Mideast.

 These facts were repeatedly covered up by the Obama regime and its media operatives.

 The other side of the story involves an ultra-secret order from Obama known as PSD-11 and how it details the aiding and abetting of the Muslim Brotherhood’s takeover efforts in the Mideast.

We would bet that Obama’s old guard media, which has been proven to have been in collusion with both Obama and Hillary’s propaganda machines, would also fail to report these particular facts.

All of these points, together, would seem to be reason enough to doubt most if not all of the intel narrative emerging from the White House and it’s co-opted intelligence bureaus.

But, when all else fails, regarding who you should endeavor to trust, just remember this one now infamous admonition and exactly who stated it–” if you like your doctor– you can keep him.”

Listen to Commentary on this story

About the Author

Barry Secrest

A native of the Charlotte area, Barry Secrest is the owner of two successful ventures, one in business and the other in media: Carolina Industrial Agency and Conservative Refocus. He has more than 25 years of experience in the insurance industry. Barry is also the author of the book “A Perfect Liberal Storm” which was released in late July of 2010.

Be the first to comment on "Obama’s Record of Altering National Intelligence Data on ISIS Good Reason to Also Doubt Russian Hacking Narrative"

Leave a Reply