many Americans are becoming increasingly stunned that the media, at this point, appears to be operating within a condoned false matrix. —>
As report after report surfaces, on an almost daily basis, describing what could only be defined as an extraordinary agenda of ethics violations, on Hillary Clinton’s acceptance of foundation donations for US state Department access, many Americans are becoming increasingly stunned that the media, at this point, appears to be operating within a condoned false matrix.
In effect, while the media reports continue accumulating in a-worse-than-Nixon paradigm, for Clinton, that same media appears to be compartmentalizing Hillary Clinton into two distinct caricatures.
On the one hand, we have the Good-Hillary portrayed by the mediawho’s running for President and is simultaneously being cast as the best and most qualified person for the job–while on the other hand, we have a separate Bad-Hillary, who was the former Secretary of State and who essentially sold out America for her own personal avarice, to the tune of hundreds of millions, while leaving an entire globe in flames, in her wake.
Unfortunately for Hillary and our fully schizo’ media, these two characters, at least to the American people, are indeed occupying the same space and are the same person.
With only those revelations which have been discovered thus far, in any other presidential race, Hillary would not stand a chance in hell of being elected president, and so it is in this race….truth be told
WASHINGTON (AP) – More than half the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state gave money – either personally or through companies or groups – to the Clinton Foundation.
It’s an extraordinary proportion indicating her possible ethics challenges if elected president.
At least 85 of 154 people from private interests who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton while she led the State Department donated to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs, according to a review of State Department calendars released so far to The Associated Press.
Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million.
At least 40 donated more than $100,000 each, and 20 gave more than $1 million.
Donors who were granted time with Clinton included an internationally known economist who asked for her help as the Bangladesh government pressured him to resign from a nonprofit bank he ran; a Wall Street executive who sought Clinton’s help with a visa problem and Estee Lauder executives who were listed as meeting with Clinton while her department worked with the firm’s corporate charity to counter gender-based violence in South Africa.
The meetings between the Democratic presidential nominee and foundation donors do not appear to violate legal agreements Clinton and former president Bill Clinton signed before she joined the State Department in 2009.
But the frequency of the overlaps shows the intermingling of access and donations, and fuels perceptions that giving the foundation money was a price of admission for face time with Clinton. Her calendars and emails released as recently as this week describe scores of contacts she and her top aides had with foundation donors.
The AP’s findings represent the first systematic effort to calculate the scope of the intersecting interests of Clinton foundation donors and people who met personally with Clinton or spoke to her by phone about their needs.
The 154 did not include U.S. federal employees or foreign government representatives.
Clinton met with representatives of at least 16 foreign governments that donated as much as $170 million to the Clinton charity, but they were not included in AP’s calculations because such meetings would presumably have been part of her diplomatic duties.
Last week, the Clinton Foundation moved to head off ethics concerns about future donations by announcing changes planned if Clinton is elected….