Libyan Regime Change Linked to Globalist Agenda

Hillary Clinton’s Toppling of Libya Linked to US-Globalist Agenda Overthrowing Seven Mideast Nations.  —>

Guest article by Barry Secrest | Conservative Refocus

Former NATO commander, General Wesley Clark,  continually speaks to the fact that an actual coup took place in the US  government, just before 2001, which changed everything, both within the US political establishment and across the world.

The question, as it applies to Hillary Clinton, who was initially funded by globalist George Soros, revolves around her actions in orchestrating US attacks which eventually brought down the nation of Libya, and killed Libyan leader Muammar Ghadafy.

General Clark, in numerous presentations, has meticulously explained how, according to a highly-trusted source, a Top-Secret memo received from on high, at the Pentagon, described how America’s military leadership was leveraged into a timeline commanding the US government’s intent to overthrow seven Mideast nations in five years, for reasons unknown to the military leaders themselves.

The overthrow of these nations, according to the General’s Pentagon source, had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks, however, 9/11 was the event utilized to enable an angry storm of American and European fighters, into Iraq and Afghanistan, enabled by US congress.

The Globally inclined administration of George W. Bush was, in fact, the operative factor that sank both America’s military might and wealth into a  plot that has proved pivotal, only to be followed by Obama’s massive withdrawal, eventually culminating in a Mideast that now finds itself at the heart of a continual conflict.

General Clark’s expanded commentary on the US government Coup

When we observe the upheaval caused by the refugee crisis that has ensued, as a result of these regime topplings’, we can begin to see a grand design at play that has incrementally threatened both the West and the entire free world, as it turns out.

The Director of the CIA lambasted and even deflected talk of a super-caliphate even while the  massive terrorist army of ISIS was being formed

ISIS, which came predictably into being after the US vacated Iraq along with its super-caliphate goals, was birthed and began to tyrannically dominate the region while continuing its demonic march spurring a massive refugee exodus of millions into Europe and abroad.

Reports have further indicated that the refugees are being herded towards Europe by widespread promises of a comparatively lavish lifestyle, as juxtaposed against the poverty so often found in many Mideast and Northern Africa nations.

Seven Mideast Nations

-Syria (in play via US involvement)

-Iraq (overthrown via US involvement)

-Libya (overthrown via US involvement)

-Somalia

-Sudan

-Lebanon

-Iran

The actions, meanwhile, from a sitting US President, have proven well beyond telling, in that President Obama, even now, continually refuses to even acknowledge the terrorists’ ideological underpinnings of Islam and Shariah, within ISIS.

There are additional concerns, with regard to the Obama regime, involving its adherence to a secret executive memo titled PSD-11, which the White House refuses to talk about. The PSD-11 document centers around an Obama mandate to support the widespread Mideast efforts of the Muslim Brotherhood and its goals, despite the group’s having been recognized as a terrorist organization, by US Mideastern allies.

When Conspiracy Theory Becomes Fact

Europe, as a result  (and the US to a lesser degree) has been thrust into a semi-state of terror, as a large and growing Mideastern-Islamic population has begun to culturally transform Europe into an Islamic-appeasing state.

Some have even stated that Europe is on the verge of collapse, as a direct result of the EU Islamic refugee influx that was enabled, if not demanded, by the Global Elites, while America is even now experiencing an ideological Civil War of rhetoric and court cases being fought between opposing sides, concerning federal authority on forced migrant refugee relocations.

In essence, the Globalist plan to topple the Mideast into chaos and then spreading that chaos abroad is only one side of the story.

The other side of the story speaks to Hillary Clinton’s role,  as provided by the following article, within that agenda, as the leader of the US State Department, and in conjunction with her long-standing relationship with the International banking family of the Rothschilds, who head the globalists movement towards a one-world order.

The story, as related from “The National Interest,” details how Hillary Clinton followed a shadowy roadmap to topple the nation of Libya, without any true national security interest, for America.

The question then becomes did Hillary Clinton urge the toppling of Libya in conjunction with shadowy Globalist designs, that are only now becoming apparent with regard to the aftermath?

“Prior to the February 17, 2011, “Day of Rage,” Libya had a national budget surplus of 8.7 percent of GDP in 2010, with oil production at 1.8 million barrels per day, on track to reach its goal of 3 million barrels per day.

Currently, oil production has decreased by over 80 percent. Following the revolution, the Libyan economy contracted by an estimated 41.8 percent, with a national deficit of 17.1 percent GDP in 2011.

Before the revolution, Libya was a secure, prospering, secular Islamic country and a critical ally providing intelligence on terrorist activity post–September 11, 2001. Qaddafi was no longer a threat to the United States.

Yet Secretary of State Hillary Clinton strongly advocated and succeeded in convincing the administration to support the Libyan rebels with a no-fly zone, intended to prevent a possible humanitarian disaster that turned quickly into all-out war.

Within weeks of the revolution, there were two valid cease-fire opportunities, one presented to the Department of Defense and Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), and a second opportunity presented to U.S. Africa Command for direct military commander negotiations to effect Gaddafi’s abdication, in which I was personally involved. Both opportunities were rejected and shut down by Secretary Clinton. Internal communications that went public last year revealed that on March 18, 2011, a colonel in JCS wrote, “. . . Due to the UNSCR, Libyan forces sped up ops to get to Benghazi, and will soon cease-fire.

As expected. Our contact will arrange a face-to-face meeting with Saif, or a skype/video-telecon to open communications if time does not permit. It will have to be with a high-levelUSG official for him to agree. If there will be an ultimatum before any ops, the USG must be in communication with the right leaders and hopefully listen for any answer. A peaceful solution is still possible that keeps Saif on our side without any bloodshed in Benghazi.” However, on March 14, 2011, Secretary Clinton had already met with rebel leaders in Paris, including Mahmoud Jibril, number two in the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood, and had committed to support their revolution.

Despite valid ceasefire opportunities to prevent “bloodshed in Benghazi” at the onset of hostilities, Secretary Clinton intervened and quickly pushed her foreign policy in support of a revolution led by the Muslim Brotherhood and known terrorists in the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group”…

Continue Reading