E.U. president openly admits to an agenda for global governance.
With Britain deliberating a possible European Union exist strategy and globalist puppets President Barack Obama and leading Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton pushing back against the endeavor, it has become increasingly important for the general public to understand the true agenda behind the E.U.
The globalist concept for a “United Europe” is based on, they claim, the concept of the United States. The states in America were originally individual and sovereign states that eventually joined together to form a union but have since sold out to the rule of multinational corporations and a corrupt Washington-centered bureaucratic federal government.
In the same sense, European countries which were originally sovereign and independent have joined together with an external corporate overlord dictating policy thereby dissolving their individual sovereignty.
It is the very definition of global governance.
As the debate over the forthcoming EU referendum gears up, it would be wise perhaps to remember how Britain was led into membership in the first place. It seems to me that most people have little idea why one of the victors of the Second World War should have become almost desperate to join this “club”. That’s a shame, because answering that question is key to understanding why the EU has gone so wrong.
Most students seem to think that Britain was in dire economic straits, and that the European Economic Community – as it was then called – provided an economic engine which could revitalize our economy. Others seem to believe that after the Second World War Britain needed to recast her geopolitical position away from empire, and towards a more realistic one at the heart of Europe. Neither of these arguments, however, makes any sense at all. READ MORE